From:
"Christopher H. Laco" <chris.laco [at] threetech.com>
Date:
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
To:
<axkit-users [at] axkit.org>
Subject:
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding
Well, it made sense, but it doesn't change anything.
I added this to httpd.conf:
AxTranslateOutput On
AxOutputCharset ISO-8859-1
killed apache, cleared the cache directory, and restarted apache.
Same result as before...
---
* Warning: Character Encoding mismatch! The character encoding
specified in the HTTP header («utf-8») is different from the one
specified in the META element («iso-8859-1»). I will use «utf-8» for
this validation.
---
So clearly , the solution is to change everything to declare UTF-8 instead
:-)
In the last exciting episode of Das Internet, Christopher H. Laco sent
forth the following words of wisdom:
> I'll bet money that is exactly the problem. Although, this sorta makes
> me ask; doesn't this make the process of specifying encoding in all the
> xml/xsl docs pointless?
>
> In case anyone is curious... http://today.icantfocus.com/
> It's not much yet, but it's built entirely in AxKit.
>
> -=Chris
UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 07:33:53 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Piers Harding on 6 Oct 2002 08:26:30 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 15:28:53 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 15:42:42 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 16:18:26 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 16:33:18 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Piers Harding on 6 Oct 2002 16:08:44 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Piers Harding on 6 Oct 2002 16:21:36 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Tod Harter on 7 Oct 2002 12:28:45 -0000
Back up to archives |
These pages are copyright © 2002 Apache Software Foundation


Index