From:
"Christopher H. Laco" <chris.laco [at] threetech.com>
Date:
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:26:53 -0400 (EDT)
To:
<michael.kroell [at] uibk.ac.at>
To:
<axkit-users [at] axkit.org>
Subject:
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding
Bing! Thanks for the cluestick. The XSL stylesheet had <?xml ..encoding="iso-8859-1"?> at the top, but I had nothing in the encoding="" attribute of <xsl:output .../> Duh. Thanks, -=Chris In the last exciting episode of Das Internet, Michael Kroell sent forth the following words of wisdom: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >>> Now, here's what I don't understand. All of my XSP and XSL pages have >>> their encoding set to iso-8859-1 via the encoding attribute. I have >>> no idea where to go from here. > > do you mean > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> > or > <xsl:output method="xml" encoding="iso-8859-1"/> > ? > > The default xsl:output encoding, and with it the charset header sent > along, is utf-8. AxKit takes the value of the xsl:output encoding > attribute for the charset header, so setting that should do it in your > case. > > michael > >
UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 07:33:53 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Piers Harding on 6 Oct 2002 08:26:30 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 15:28:53 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 15:42:42 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 16:18:26 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Christopher H. Laco on 6 Oct 2002 16:33:18 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Piers Harding on 6 Oct 2002 16:08:44 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Piers Harding on 6 Oct 2002 16:21:36 -0000
Re: UTF headers vs. ISO-8859-1 encoding - Tod Harter on 7 Oct 2002 12:28:45 -0000
Back up to archives |
These pages are copyright © 2002 Apache Software Foundation


Index